The JudgeThis is a featured page

I'm sorry, but this Paris Hilton thing has me a little annoyed. I'm not saying that she shouldn't do her time, but where is the outrage when child molesters, murderers, and armed robbers get out of jail early? If jails are over crowded, I'd rather see tax dollars go to keep hard criminals off the street vs. Paris Hilton.

I'd love to see someone ask the tough questions like...how many people has this judge sentenced to jail who have been let go early? Including child molesters, murderers, and armed robbers? Was he outraged? If yes, good for him. If not, is he just trying to make a name for himself?


Does anyone know more about this judge? Same for the DA? How many times has he put up a battle to make sure hardened criminals stay off the streets?

If the media wasn't so obsessed with Hollywood, they'd look into this!


No user avatar
whatalife
Latest page update: made by whatalife , Jun 13 2007, 5:12 PM EDT (about this update About This Update whatalife Edited by whatalife

12 words added

view changes

- complete history)
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
Anonymous judge is ok, sheriff is not 0 Jul 4 2007, 12:34 AM EDT by Anonymous
 
Thread started: Jul 4 2007, 12:34 AM EDT  Watch
The judge has a rep for fairness and consistency. Judges have problems with the sheriff generally undermining the judicial branch- he has no right to decide the proper sentence for anything.. He only has authority to deal with overcrowding by early release. Unfairly, he has a revolving door for people he likes (celebs, rich folk) rather than cutting a break for ordinary folk who could use a few days off their long sentence (months, not Paris's tiny bit) and are in for obviously non-threatening stuff like possession. DUIs are not non-threatening - until they decide the penalty is too steep, they will continue to drive drunk and have a very high chance of killing/maiming themselves and others. DUIs should be at the bottom of the list for overcrowding-based release. Sorry, Paris.

Paris's fame just meant the sheriff didn't get away with playing judge this time, everybody knew right away and citizens complained. He didn't follow the normal channels for asking for change of sentence for medical reasons, didn't put her in the med wing before "reassigning", didn't get judge's permission. Her pet psychiatrist's opinion doesn't count. Bogus, and the judge knew it.

Methinks either the sheriff (known for vicious retaliation in his own dept against anybody who questions his policies or runs against him) or the Hilton family or both are behind all the nonsense aimed at "bringing down" the prosecutor and the judge. What twits. The sheriff and the Hiltons, I mean. Nobody got killed by a bunch of unpaid parking tickets or no proof of insurance, hence the disinterest of the court in doing anything but issuing bench warrants (translation: they don't go after you until you're stopped for something else). DUIs do kill. Hence DUIs get jailtime for probation violation, parking ticket scofflaws get fines. The prosecutor and judge were just doing their job, treating Paris Hilton like any DUI.
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)
Patty Couldn't agree more 0 Jun 8 2007, 8:54 PM EDT by Patty
Thread started: Jun 8 2007, 8:54 PM EDT  Watch
This entire set of proceedings lacks perspective in so many ways -- it's totally crazy. Celebrity schadenfreude -- great for drawing attention to the failings and unevenness of our justice system.
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


Showing 2 of 2 threads for this page

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)